We have all heard that the
sequence of human DNA differs from chimpanzee DNA by only about 1%. Yet humans are capable of building complex
civilizations while the chimps are still eating bugs in the forest. If you compare the human brain to the brain
of any other primate, it’s easy to see where our sophisticated cognitive
abilities come from.
From thebrain.mcgill.ca |
DNA is the blueprint for
making proteins, cells and organs, so is there something special hidden in that
1% sequence difference that gives humans bigger brains? In particular, scientists have focused on
regions in the human genome that have undergone rapid sequence changes in the
human lineage, but not in other primates.
Besides looking for differences in genes that make proteins, we can also
look for changes in regulatory regions, like enhancers, that control when and
where the genes are expressed.
A recent paper in Current Biology by Boyd et al. explores these questions by studying a human-accelerated regulatory
enhancer (HARE5), which differs significantly between humans and chimps.
Enhancer activity of HARE5
How do you study
enhancers? One way is to use a reporter
gene. Enhancers drive expression of
nearby genes, so what if you swapped out a nearby gene and replaced it with a
gene for a fluorescent protein? Then you
can look at your organism and wherever you see the fluorescent protein, the
enhancer is active, meaning that the normal “nearby gene” is normally expressed
in those cells. Instead of doing these
experiments with chimps and humans, which would take forever and be unethical
in some cases, the authors put these reporter constructs into mice. The enhancers from the chimps and humans
drove expression of the reporter gene in the embryonic mouse brains. The gene adjacent to the human enhancer was
expressed earlier in development and more strongly than when placed next to
the chimp enhancer (in other words, a lot more protein is being made).
Reporter gene experiment. The mouse brain images are actual results from Figure 2 in Boyd et al. (2015). |
This tells us that whatever
normal gene is near HARE5, it is probably expressed earlier and way more in
humans than in chimps. There are just 10
sequence differences in the human HARE5 (i.e. mutations), which is enough to
affect the way the enhancer functions and activates expression of genes.
Frizzled expression is
regulated by HARE5
So which genes are near the
HARE5 sequence? The closest gene is
called Frizzled 8 and it is a receptor that responds to signals sent by other
cells. Frizzled 8 (FZD8) is a well known
component of the Wnt signaling pathway that regulates many aspects of embryonic
development, including neurogenesis (formation of new neurons). The authors demonstrate that the mouse HARE5
physically interacts with Fzd8, which is a necessary first step of gene expression, so Fzd8 is
likely affected by the HARE5 sequence differences in humans and chimps.
The authors wanted to see
what would happen to development of the mouse brain when Fzd8 is expressed in the same
pattern as in humans or chimps. They
repeated the earlier experiments, but this time instead of using a reporter
gene, they put the mouse Fzd8 gene next to the chimp or human HARE5
sequence. They injected these DNA
constructs into mice and waited to see what would happen to embryonic brain
development. When the chimp-HARE5 was
driving expression of Fzd8, not much changed in terms of mouse brain
development. However, when the
human-HARE5 sequence was activating the mouse Fzd8 gene, the mouse brain grew
12% bigger!!
Let me be clear here-- they are not expressing the human Fzd gene in
mice. No, they are using the human
enhancer to drive expression of the mouse Fzd8 gene, so presumably it is
expressed more and earlier in development (like they saw in the reporter gene
experiment). The neural progenitor cells
(pre-neurons) divided faster than in a normal mouse, leading to formation of
more neurons, and a bigger brain!
10 sequence changes in an
enhancer may be one reason why I am able to write and you are able to read and
understand this blog. Whoa. No news yet about whether these mice with
bigger brains are also able to read and write… I’m sure they’re saving that for
another paper.
Here's another blogger's take on this paper